1. Panasonics Connection to Leica
Panasonic and Leica release many cameras that are only different in firmware and small cosmetic changes and Panasonic cameras often come with Leica branded lenses. Despite this, Leica have yet to release a camera in Panasonics flagship camera format.
2. M43rd Success
It seems that Panasonic and Olympus learned from their experiences with 43rds and has created a format with broader appeal, a format that other manufacturers must copy not to miss out on a large market opportunity. Samsung and Sony already followed track, Canon and Nikon are expected to release their hybrid cameras soon. Will Leica get involved?
3. Basic Lenses Covered
The m43rds lens offering has grown gradually and are now (January 2011) covering a selection of wide angel, standard, fisheye, fast pancake, super zoom, macro and tele lenses. The format has enjoyed commercial success and has a good base of users and supporters. The next natural step for the format is delivering sharp premium big aperture lenses, which happens to be Leicas speciality.
4. The Leica 45mm Macro Lens
Leica have already released the Leica 45mm f2.8
5. Panasonics Missing Roadmap
Samsung, Olympus and Sony all have a detailed roadmap for their lens releases of 2011. Panasonic only mentioned what kind of lenses they where considering making in a PowerPoint. This could be because the new lenses will be co developed and Leica branded.
6. Leicas Missing Segment
The premium Leica camera M9
7. Leica M Mount Lenses good fit on M43
Leicas M mount lenses fit nicely on M43rd cameras with an adapter. By including information about the products in the package, it could be a great opportunity for Leica to introduce photo enthusiasts to their finer glass.
8. M43rds Sensor Development
Leica VP of marketing Christian Erhardt said this about Micro Four Thirds:
"One reason why we've decided not to move into Micro Four Thirds is that we have looked at the sensor size and realized that it cannot produce the image quality that we need. Therefore we decided to stick with the full format in addition to APS-C. It's all about the ratios"
Many were disappointed with his comment. The sensor is only marginally smaller then the APS-C and they sell many Leica branded models with smaller sensors. There could be many motivations for saying this, including tactical reasons, like selling more X1. Olympus has proven that getting great Jpeg quality of the 12MPx sensor is totally achievable with their E5.
The new multi-aspect GH2
9. Increased Competition
M43rds has the first mover advantage to the hybrid camera market., their camera and lens selection are more developed and better then the competitions. They have the goodwill from many supporters now, but only as long as they stay ahead of the curve. Some have been tempted by the Sony NEX smaller form factor (the camera body, not the lenses) and bigger sensor. Getting Leica onboard the M43rds format will create a lot of buzz and give the format the boost it needs to keep the big train in front of the pack.
10. The Lumix GF2 Release
The GF1
The answer was the GF2, a nice and small camera, but very different to the GF1. It is targeted at the “point & shoot” users/mass market with focus on the touch screen and a blue intelligent auto button. Its small size and gimmicky features make it an obvious competitor to the Sony NEX, but the enthusiasts who had expected the next GF1 was left wanting more.
The GF1 is discontinued and there is a room in the market for a premium compact hybrid camera, so I predict to you the spiritual successor of the GF1:
The Leica M43rd Camera
The camera will be similar sized to the GF1, have a built in EVF
Do you think this is realistic? Would you buy the camera? What would you pay for it?







6 comments:
I would be willing to pay about the same amount as the GH2 for such a camera, but unfortunately I can't even find a GH2!
I too would pay about the same as a GH2 for this, but let's be honest, it would cost well over $2000 jut for the body. I would have to be heavily invested in Leica glass before I put down that kind of cash for a m4/3 Leica body
I think Leica is correct, in that the sensor is too small to produce the quality that their users/buyers would demand. The 4/3rds sensor is 17.3 x 13 mm (225 mm²), yet the APS-C size is quite larger, i.e. Nikon's at 23.6 x 15.7 mm (370 mm²).
If Leica was ever to release a m4/3 camera, it would be just a rebranded Panasonic model, and as a matter of course, it would cost twice as much as the Panasonic just for sporting the red dot!
Might happen, but unlikely, and even if it happens, I am not interested.
What a load... and I'm an m4/3 owner.
This is all rationalization, ex post facto arguments, and magical thinking.
Wishful thinking, considering how Panasonic's sensors are lagging behind the competition.
Post a Comment